Oregon’s rural communities are growing, just at a much slower pace than in urban centers. Net population change results from the combination of two factors: natural increase or decrease in a population (births minus deaths); and net migration (in-migrants minus out-migrants). In-migration – new residents moving in – accounts for all of the population growth in rural Oregon between 2010 and 2016. Oregon’s 23 rural counties combined actually had a natural decrease, with 400 more deaths than births among residents. In metro counties, natural increase accounted for 33 percent of population gains between 2010 and 2016.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg20xqpgf8XEOO0IbDWe-t86bfVvoW2tJ2J1Z_uoMIp5xlVJiQCcK3__m5PoUyS8595hOsLvYI6AskotN2I4kwDtz2io2UNfdOuEBVpk0Bbn7K_RwtUR6uefK_-AwjgIZuUCgN_QYUdfsuG/s640/06.09.17+pop+nat+increase.png)
A lack of natural increase alone wouldn’t be troubling for the workforce pipeline in rural areas, so long as in-migration included working adults and children. Between 1995 and 2015, that does not appear to be the trend though. There are more than 35,000 additional workers ages 55 and older in rural Oregon today, an increase of 135 percent. Meanwhile, the rural prime working age and youth workforces are both smaller today than back in 1995.
Rural Oregon is in need of its next generation of leaders and could benefit from finding ways to alleviate the tendency toward aging that is a major challenge in many nonmetro areas. Read more about demographics and the workforce in rural Oregon in the full article at QualityInfo.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment